NC Secretary of State Elaine Marshall [ https://www.elainemarshall.com/ ] came to the monthly meeting of Wilkes County Democrats on Wednesday at Olive Garden in Wilkesoboro.  She is the first woman to be elected to that office and the first woman elected to statewide executive office in North Carolina. In 2016, Marshall was re-elected to a sixth term as North Carolina Secretary of State with 52.26 percent of the vote, earning more votes (and a higher share of the vote) than any other Democrat running statewide. She is running for re-election in 2020. 

Marshall has been active in Democratic politics in North Carolina for over 30 years. From the early 1970s, she was active in the Young Democrats organization and eventually became National Secretary of the Young Democrats of America. In Harnett County, where she practiced law, Marshall served as President of Democratic Women and, in 1991, served as chair of the Harnett County Democratic Party. Marshall was first elected to public office in 1992 as a member of the North Carolina Senate representing the 15th Senate District.

http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2019/10/29/a-reminder-of-what-the-gop-budget-would-mean-for-north-carolina/

IF Berger and Moore do succeed with ramming through their budget after recess the negative impacts will be significant. Here are four that stand out according to Rob Shofield of NCPolicy Watch:
​
#1 – Worsening an already inadequate and regressive tax structure – It often gets lost in the shuffle in the discussion of high-profile matters like teacher pay and Medicaid expansion, but it’s critical to remember that repeated GOP tax cuts have slashed North Carolina’s overall public investments dramatically over the last decade. When one looks at state spending as a share of total state income, the budget proposal is nearly 18% below North Carolina’s 45-year average and as much as 25% less than what the state spent on public structures and services in the boom years of the mid-1990’s.
​
And, of course, this decline in spending has been accompanied by a similar crash in the progressivity of the tax code. Today, low and moderate-income taxpayers pay significantly more of their income in state and local taxes than do the top 1%. The proposed tax cuts in the vetoed budget will only worsen this problem

#2 – Further undermining the state’s desperately underfunded public schools – As veteran education policy analyst Kris Nordstrom explained in July, there are myriad ways to illustrate the damage the state lawmakers are doing to North Carolina’s once-proud and now-threadbare public education system, but here are three that tell you about all you need to know:

• Overall, the conference budget would have left total school funding 2.9 percent below pre-Recession levels when adjusted for enrollment growth and inflation. This figure underestimates the actual budget pressures faced by North Carolina’s public schools, as schools’ largest cost drivers – salary and benefit costs – have increased faster than traditional measures of inflation.
• Of the 24 biggest allotments in FY 08-09, 20 of them remain below their pre-Recession levels (see tables here and here).
• North Carolina would continue to spend significantly less per pupil than South Carolina.

#3 – The Medicaid failure – It’s been thoroughly and repeatedly documented how the GOP budget’s failure to expand Medicaid will cost hundreds of lives, billions of dollars and thousands of jobs, but here’s another less-well-publicized fact: it will actually make the current system even more inadequate. As NC Budget and Tax Center analyst Suzy Khachaturyan explained this summer, the budget slashes funding for existing Medicaid by underfunding adjustments for anticipated enrollment and cutting millions in administrative funding.

#4 – Shortchanging our natural environment – At a time of a dire global environmental crisis, the proposed budget does little-to-nothing to tackle this vital issue. For instance, as Policy Watch’s Lisa Sorg reported in June, the Department of Environmental Quality had requested 37 new positions in the state environmental budget to address the crisis of perfluorinated compounds in drinking water supplies. The proposed budget adds just five additional full-time positions – only two of which are devoted to the critical roles of sampling and analysis.